Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results: [+1] 5 [+0] 1 [-1] 0
The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 4 votes from Adrian, Erwan, Anil, Jacopo. I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the package. Jacopo On Nov 8, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04 > branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 10.04.04" (major release number: > "10.04"; minor release number: "04"), will supersede the release "Apache > OFBiz 10.04.03". > Main reason for this new release (after the recent release of 10.04.03) is > that the new version is bundled with an updated release of Tomcat containing > some fixes for vulnerabilities recently announced by the Tomcat community. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > (committers only) or from here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ > > (everyone else) > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-10.04.04.zip: the release package, based on the 10.04 branch > at revision 1407002 (latest as of now) > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-10.04.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-10.04.04.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-10.04.04.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on > testing the signatures seehttp://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 10.04.04 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be closed in 72 hours. > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > The following text is quoted from the above url: > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval -- > i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed. > Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone identifies > serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies with the > individual serving as release manager." > > Kind Regards, > > Jacopo >
