All tests passed successfully after I removed it (as I was suspecting). Should we move juel-2.2.1.jar to the j2eespecs folder? Do you have some details from where the juel-2.2.1.jar comes and from where we should take the updates? Thanks!
Jacopo On Apr 6, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Adrian Crum <[email protected]> wrote: > Try removing the el-api-2.2.jar file and see what happens. > > -Adrian > > On 4/6/2013 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> As I mentioned a few times, I am concerned about the amount of jar files >> bundled in OFBiz: there are so many and some of them are really old and, >> because of dependencies and the lack of proper documentation (we did not a >> good job in keeping track of what we have, from where it comes and how it is >> used, and if bug fix releases are issued etc...) no one seems really able to >> manage them properly. >> In order to try to gain control of the situation I have started the long, >> boring and complex process of analyzing each and every jar, trying to figure >> out their dependencies and how they are used. >> I am still at the early stage of this effort, but I would like to report a >> couple of possible issues: >> >> 1) geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.0.jar seems to contain the same classes of >> xml-apis-2.9.1.jar (javax.xml.namespace); we can probably remove >> geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.0.jar >> 2) juel-2.2.1.jar contains classes for the packages javax.el and >> de.odysseus.el; the file el-api-2.2.jar, that is required by Tomcat, >> contains classes for the packages javax.el; how should we deal with this? >> (maybe Adrian knows what to do) >> >> This is all for now, >> >> Jacopo >> >
