[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13694556#comment-13694556
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4794 at 6/27/13 8:45 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
=== FORGOT A 4th point ===
# Ha sorry indeed, I did not mean port offset in this way. I meant the way you
suggested of course (would not make sense anyway, what would be a port offset
patch?). Something like
{code}
Index: ofbiz-component.xml
===================================================================
--- ofbiz-component.xml (revision 1493331)
+++ ofbiz-component.xml (working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
<!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
<container name="naming-container" loaders="rmi"
class="org.ofbiz.base.container.NamingServiceContainer">
<property name="host" value="0.0.0.0"/>
- <property name="port" value="1099"/>
+ <property name="port" value="21099"/>
</container>
<!-- load BeanShell remote telnet server -->
{code}
# Work for me? You must be kidding!
Anyway, thanks for you comments Adrian and Scott. But I will do as I want
mostly because:
# I don't like much the complicated idea of maintaining patches in one
committers people folder, or any places anyway
# I know I'm the one who will eventually have to support it
# I'm not convinced that the patch I proposed will be annoying for anybody and
I don't foresee much config changes again in the future
# This will allow to see what we can do for the Sonar Infra task pending, where
they want a possible random port setting
was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
# Ha sorry indeed, I did not mean port offset in this way. I meant the way
you suggested of course (would not make sense anyway, what would be a port
offset patch?). Something like
{code}
Index: ofbiz-component.xml
===================================================================
--- ofbiz-component.xml (revision 1493331)
+++ ofbiz-component.xml (working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
<!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
<container name="naming-container" loaders="rmi"
class="org.ofbiz.base.container.NamingServiceContainer">
<property name="host" value="0.0.0.0"/>
- <property name="port" value="1099"/>
+ <property name="port" value="21099"/>
</container>
<!-- load BeanShell remote telnet server -->
{code}
# Work for me? You must be kidding!
Anyway, thanks for you comments Adrian and Scott. But I will do as I want
mostly because:
# I don't like much the complicated idea of maintaining patches in one
committers people folder, or any places anyway
# I know I'm the one who will eventually have to support it
# I'm not convinced that the patch I proposed will be annoying for anybody and
I don't foresee much config changes again in the future
> set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-4794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Pierre Smits
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-4794 - test port.patch, OFBIZ-4794-test-ports.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> In order to run test targets in Jenkins we need to change ports for at least
> ajp, http and https in test-containers.xml as these ports are most likely to
> be already in use by the CI server.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
