Is this rather not hidding the warning? Is a FIXME (moreover in xml code) better? Do you intent to fix it soon?
Jacques adri...@apache.org wrote: > Author: adrianc > Date: Wed Sep 25 19:57:13 2013 > New Revision: 1526276 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1526276 > Log: > Fixed a warning caused by a framework dependency on the Party component. > > Modified: > ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/servicedef/services.xml > > Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/servicedef/services.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/servicedef/services.xml?rev=1526276&r1=1526275&r2=1526276&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/servicedef/services.xml (original) > +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/servicedef/services.xml Wed Sep 25 19:57:13 > 2013 > @@ -181,9 +181,9 @@ under the License. > <description>Create a CustomTimePeriod record</description> > <auto-attributes mode="OUT" include="pk" optional="false"/> > <auto-attributes mode="IN" include="nonpk" optional="true"/> > + <attribute name="organizationPartyId" type="String" mode="IN" > optional="false"/><!-- FIXME: Framework dependency on > Party component --> <override name="fromDate" optional="false"/> > <override name="thruDate" optional="false"/> > - <override name="organizationPartyId" optional="false"/> > <override name="periodTypeId" optional="false"/> > </service> > <service name="updateCustomTimePeriod" > default-entity-name="CustomTimePeriod" engine="simple"
