At revision: 1526686 I put a better comment in templates/web.xml and removes useless and confusing websiteId in web.xml files
I did not remove some others, but I believe they don't make sense as they are. Take for instance those data <WebSite webSiteId="EBAY_STORE1" siteName="eBay Store1" standardContentPrefix="http://demo.ofbiz.org"; productStoreId="90101"/> <WebSite webSiteId="EBAY_STORE2" siteName="eBay Store2" standardContentPrefix="http://demo.ofbiz.org"; productStoreId="90102"/> <WebSite webSiteId="GOOGLEBASE" standardContentPrefix="http://demo.ofbiz.org"; productStoreId="9000" /> Sorry but http://demo.ofbiz.org/ leads nowhere! And do we need to keep those referring to productStoreId="9000" in web.xml files? They have not their own webapps <WebSite webSiteId="CmsSite" siteName="CMS Web Site"/> <WebSite webSiteId="OfbizSite" siteName="OFBiz Web Site"/> <WebSite webSiteId="GOOGLECHECKOUT" productStoreId="9000" /> <WebSite webSiteId="GOOGLECHECKOUT" productStoreId="9000" /> I think we should keep in web.xml files, only ecommerce/clone and webPos (uses POS store) Jacques Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Hans, > > This makes sense http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1153352&view=rev > You said > <<Because these back-end applications do not have a website and probably > never will remove the website records and definitions in > web.xml as an experiment for the accounting, order, product and party > component. if there are no problems others will follow.... >> > > I think we should continue in applications (not content?) and do the same for > all specialpurpose applications but ecommerce and > maybe cmssite > > Then I will update this page > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6553757 > and we should comment in ScreenRenderer.populateContextForRequest() to > clarify which webapps are concerned > > > Jacques
