[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882287#comment-13882287
 ] 

Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-5040:
------------------------------------

Jacques, i completely agree with you, forms should be used as much as possible, 
I am talking backend. Frontend macros would be nice.
Forms are much easier to create and maintain, but sure have their limitations. 
However if there is a limitation, try to add a functions to the widget to solve 
that.... not sure but did we had this discussion before? I implemented the 
project manager  and had to replace tons of ftl screens in a earlier much more 
simple version.

Regards,
Hans

> Backend widget & application HTML clean-up
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-5040
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5040
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ALL APPLICATIONS
>            Reporter: Paul Piper
>              Labels: html, webapp, widget, widgetrendering
>
> I am sure that this is a common thing to know: the current backoffice 
> application relies heavily on widgets. This is good, but the current 
> standard-html-structure is not flexible enough and often lacks proper w3c 
> implementation. 
> To make matters worse, you can often find applications avoiding widgets at 
> all and rather overriding the standards with custom ftl implementations. It 
> is these customizations that break the html on numerous screens and make it 
> difficult, if not tedious to create new themes for the backoffice. 
> This task is hence to:
> * Find a consensus on a new widget standard
> * Go over each of the application ftls and convert these to the new standard 
> * Recreate the themes and simplify/clean-up special rules
> Since redoing the theme is a rather large task, we should consider to add an 
> additional css for now which stylises the replacement html instead of working 
> with the old. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to