[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14050267#comment-14050267
 ] 

Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-4053:
-----------------------------------

I'm leaning towards delegator.one()/delegator.list(), with list() being able to 
have multiple result methods(I don't care on the name).  This can be done 
without adding any new methods to the Delegator interface, by making use of a 
groovy Category.  This will allow new methods to be mixed in automatically when 
in a groovy file.

If you are in java, you'd have to be a bit more verbose, something like this:

{code:title=Query.java|BorderStyle=solid}
class Query {
  private Query() {}
  static Query use(Delegator delegator) {  }
  One one(String entityName) {  }
  List list(String entityName) {  }
  class QueryOne {
    QueryOne where(String name, Object value) { }
    QueryOne where(Map<String, ? extends Object> map) { }
    QueryOne cache(String cache) { }
  }
  class QueryList {
    QueryList where(String name, Object value) { }
    QueryList where(Map<String, ? extends Object> map) { }
    QueryList cache(String cache) { }
   }
}
{code}

> Implement an Entity Query Builder
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-4053
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4053
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: framework
>    Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>            Reporter: Scott Gray
>            Assignee: Scott Gray
>         Attachments: builder.patch
>
>
> As discussed on the dev list here: 
> http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/l6kiywqzfj656dhc
> Attached is an initial implementation of builder classes (of sorts) that make 
> use of method chaining in order to simplify use of the Delegator interface to 
> query entities.
> Rather than taking all possible query parameters into a single method as the 
> delegator does, this implementation instead builds a query through a 
> succession of distinct method calls.
> A simple example:
> {code}
> // Using the Delegator interface directly
> eli = delegator.find("FinAccountTrans", condition, null, null, 
> UtilMisc.toList("-transactionDate"), null);
> // Using the new implementation
> eli = 
> EntityBuilderUtil.list(delegator).from("FinAccountTrans").where(condition).orderBy("-transactionDate").iterator();
> {code}
> A more complex example:
> {code}
> // Delegator
> EntityCondition queryConditionsList = 
> EntityCondition.makeCondition(allConditions, EntityOperator.AND);
> EntityFindOptions options = new EntityFindOptions(true, 
> EntityFindOptions.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, 
> EntityFindOptions.CONCUR_READ_ONLY, true);
> options.setMaxRows(viewSize * (viewIndex + 1));
> EntityListIterator iterator = delegator.find("OrderHeader", 
> queryConditionsList, null, null, UtilMisc.toList("orderDate DESC"), options);
> // becomes
> EntityListIterator iterator = EntityBuilderUtil.list(delegator).distinct()
>                                                                
> .from("OrderHeader")
>                                                                
> .where(allConditions)
>                                                                
> .orderBy("orderDate DESC")
>                                                                
> .maxRows(viewSize * (viewIndex + 1))
>                                                                
> .cursorScrollInsensitive()
>                                                                .iterator();
> {code}
> A couple of issues with the implementation so far that I'm not entirely happy 
> with:
> - I'm not so sure that I like EntityBuilderUtil.list(delegator) in place of 
> something like EntityList.use(delegator).  The latter requires less typing 
> and I think is more intuitive than typing EntityBuilderUtil because of its 
> similarities to the corresponding minilang method calls, I actually kept 
> having trouble remembering what it was called when converting some delegator 
> calls over.  It also requires a little more typing (16-17 characters vs. 
> 12-13), not a big deal but every little bit helps with what would be a very 
> commonly used class.
> - I'm struggling to see the point of having the GenericQueryBuilder 
> interface, the two classes share very little in the way of API and its use 
> seems a little superfluous to me.
> Opinions on the above points or anything else to do with the implementation 
> are most welcome.  I'd like to get the API locked down (and hopefully some 
> javadocs in place) before committing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to