[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117984#comment-14117984
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2353:
----------------------------------------
[~jacopoc] Ha indeed, I intuitively see Adrian's pattern as something which is
working against the lock, waiting until it's released. It makes sense to me but
I clearly prefer your sequential way where you delegate the waiting time to the
DBMS.
> SequenceUtil may generate duplicate IDs in Load Balancing mode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-2353
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2353
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 4.0, Release Branch 09.04, Trunk
> Reporter: Philippe Mouawad
> Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, Upcoming Branch
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-2353 SELECT FOR UPDATE solution.patch, OFBIZ-2353
> SELECT FOR UPDATE solution.patch, OFBIZ-2353-AC.patch, OFBIZ-2353-AC.patch
>
>
> If Ofbiz is deploy on 2 servers in Load Balancing Mode
> SequenceUtil will generate duplicate IDs because synchronization is done at
> JVM level instead of doing it in DB.
> A good replacement implementation would be:
> org.hibernate.id.enhanced.TableGenerator
> But it would involve a dependency on Hibernate
> Philippe
> www.ubik-ingenierie.com
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
