Hi Pierre, inline:
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 5:04 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jacopo, > > There is no misunderstanding on my part. Declaring a field to reference > another record in the same entity should never be in an extension. And if > that happens, corrective actions should be undertaken. > > If Deepak had done a bit more research it would have shown that > parentCustRequestId > is used in ordermgr, see: parentCustRequestId not used directly in ordermgr. > > - http://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr/control/FindRequest FindRequest form using auto-fields-entity attribute to render the form, thats why parentCustRequestId is rendered in FindRequest form. {code} <form name="FindRequests" target="FindRequest" title="" type="single" default-map-name="parameters" header-row-style="header-row" default-table-style="basic-table"> <auto-fields-entity entity-name="CustRequest" default-field-type="find"/> <auto-fields-entity entity-name="CustRequest" default-field-type="find”/> {code} And same applies to create/edit request form. Thanks & Regards — Deepak Dixit > - http://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr/control/request > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > >> Pierre, >> >> I think that there is a misunderstanding here: the field was declared as >> an extension in the scrum component and as a consequence the relation to it >> should also be there, and Deepak fixed this issue; in fact this fix removed >> a dependency from the order to the scrum component. >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Mar 19, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> By the way, now order mgr has an even greater dependency on a special >>> purpose application. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>> Services and Retail & Trade >>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Deepak, >>>> >>>> That issue shortly after the moment release r13.07.01 came available to >>>> the public. That release didn't have numerous special purpose components >>>> incorporated. And made that bug visible. >>>> >>>> However, though something is uses at a lower level, we should not have >>>> something as basic as a parent self reference in an entity-extension in >> a >>>> lower level component. Maybe the contributor hadn't thought about that, >>>> when the component was first conceived and there after completed to its >>>> current state. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> >>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>> >>>> >> >>
