Hi all, Thanks for the votes.
This proposal passed, according to following results: - Binding: 5 positive (+1) votes (Adrian, Deepak, Jacopo, Jacques and Nicolas), 0 negative (-1) votes, 0 neutral (+0) votes - Non-Binding: 2 positive (+1) votes (Michael and), 0 negative (-1) votes, 0 neutral (+0) votes I will create an appropriate JIRA issue to track progress moving the special purpose/appserver component from trunk to attic. This will enable us to include it in release notes. Thank you for your participation. Best regards Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Jacopo. I would say another reason to have > descriptive pages per component as described in issue OFBIZ-5838 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5838>. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jacopo >> >> PS: a small clarification: the "jetty" component, rather than being a >> variation of the "appserver" component, is an alternative to the "catalina" >> component. >> >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > *Rational:* >> > The special purpose/jetty component has been intended as a specific >> > variation on the special purpose/appserver component that we decided to >> > move to OFBiz Attic recently. As this is a specific purpose component >> that >> > shares the same faith as appserver (with respect to working with current >> > versions and no contributor feeling the itch to improve) it is time to >> > decide whether or not we keep this in our trunk. >> > >> > *Proposal:* >> > >> > - Have this special purpose/jetty component moved from trunk to attic, >> > and >> > - don't include it in future releases (including the upcoming r14.x >> > branch release r14.12.01) >> > >> > For this proposal the normal 72 hour rule applies. >> > >> > Best regards >> > >> > Pierre Smits >> > >> > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> > Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> > Based Manufacturing, Professional >> > Services and Retail & Trade >> > http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> >