[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14590052#comment-14590052 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6513: ---------------------------------------- Another question is should we consider this a bug? I don't think so but it's a moot point, countyGeoId an GeoPointId are there for a long time already... > countyGeoId and geoPointId fields are missing in PartyAndPostalAddress entity > view > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-6513 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6513 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: party > Affects Versions: Trunk > Reporter: Jacques Le Roux > Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > > Rather than adding both fields, I will rather add an allias-all. Then if ever > we add new fields to PostalAddress they will not miss there. > While at it I looked for such issues in other entity views based on > PostalAddress. All but PartyExport (accounting) and ShipmentManifestView use > an allias-all on PostalAddress. > I think we should do the same for ShipmentManifestView but I'm not sure about > PartyExport, though I don't see an issue there using an allias-all too. > Opinions? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)