[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14590071#comment-14590071
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6514:
----------------------------------------
Done at revision: 1686071
Like for OFBIZ-6513, I wonder if we should not backport those. For me both
cases should not introduces issues but could help users to have something more
complete OOTB. So I don't close yet...
Opinions?
> All postalAddress simple-map-processors miss some fields
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6514
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: party, product
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> There are 5 postalAddress simple-map-processors. All miss some fields which
> are in PostalAddress entity.
> This could be seen as a moot point for some of them, but the main ones in
> party and product component should not miss these fields.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
