+1 Jacques.

Best regards,

Pranay Pandey
HotWax Systems
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Pranay Pandey <
pranay.pan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:

> + Jacques.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pranay Pandey
> HotWax Systems
> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
>> And also because else people tends to reproduce by C/P blocks of code
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 18/06/2016 à 12:21, Pranay Pandey a écrit :
>>
>>> Yes Deepak, IMO we should change it for existing code as well, because
>>> this
>>> type of checks some times cause functional issues on null checks on
>>> GenericValue.
>>>
>>> My vote will be to go for it.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Pranay Pandey
>>> HotWax Systems
>>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Deepak Dixit <
>>> deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we can make it part of best practice and use for new code.
>>>> For old code, Do we need to change existing code?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Deepak Dixit
>>>> www.hotwaxsystems.com
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Michael Brohl <
>>>> michael.br...@ecomify.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>> ecomify GmbH
>>>>> www.ecomify.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.06.16 um 16:30 schrieb Ratnesh Upadhyay:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello community,
>>>>>
>>>>>> There are lots of places in code where we have used
>>>>>> UtilValidate.isNotEmpty() or UtilValidate.isEmpty() for GenericValue
>>>>>> object
>>>>>> . GenericValue is never empty. Its always null or not null. So should
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> use directly null or not null check instead of
>>>>>> UtilValidate.isNotEmpty()
>>>>>> and UtilValidate.isEmpty() for GenericValue objects ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically these validation methods should preferably be used on
>>>>>> Strings
>>>>>>
>>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>> Lists and normal Maps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Ratnesh Upadhyay
>>>>>> HotWax Systems | www.hotwaxsystems.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to