+1 for keeping only the 13.07 and the trunk. As far as I know we never had 14.12 and 15.12 as demo environments (please correct me if I'm wrong Jacques :-) - so we are not taking anything away. Either way the branch releases are for developers and they already know how to manage, build, synch and patch the codebase themselves.
Also I'm very aware of the amount of time Jacques spends looking after the demos and fixing them when they fail â so I'd be much happier if his workload was reduced rather than increased. Thanks Sharan On 2016-07-15 09:03 (+0200), Deepak Dixit <deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > >> suggest that we keep only two demo VMs instead of three. One for old / > >>stable (13) and one for trunk and that's it. Once we branch out 16 and > >>stabilize it into a release then we reshuffle things again. > > +1 > > I think its good idea to keep stable release (13) and trunk on demo > instance. I see no reason to keep 14 or 15 on demo instance as we are not > going to release them in future. > > > > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > -1 to the proposal to remove dev branche(s) from the demo environment, as > > they offer a easy (and welcome) comparison between a local dev environment > > and the running release branch. > > > > It also helps to provide generic links, as pasted urls from localhost can > > result in something totally different from contributor to contributor. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > > > It seems nobody disagreed so I will apply this KISS plan, thanks Taher > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 10/07/2016 à 06:53, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > > > > >> Thanks Taher, > > >> > > >> I finally see no reasons to not send this message to the dev ML. I > > >> forward your answer. > > >> > > >> Jacques > > >> > > >> > > >> Le 09/07/2016 à 19:00, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > > >> > > >>> Hi Jacques, > > >>> > > >>> I suggest that we keep only two demo VMs instead of three. One for old > > / > > >>> stable (13) and one for trunk and that's it. Once we branch out 16 and > > >>> stabilize it into a release then we reshuffle things again. > > >>> > > >>> Under the exceptional transformational conditions we are going > > through, I > > >>> think I would not bother with having too many demos up and running > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> Taher Alkhateeb > > >>> > > >>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > > >>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> I have promised to Gavin to put in place the demos on the new VM this > > >>>> weekend. > > >>>> > > >>>> I think I can easily do it with the current setting. But I wonder if > > we > > >>>> could not benefit from this change to also change the versioned demos. > > >>>> > > >>>> On the other hand it's a bold decision because it would mean that we > > >>>> switch R13 to old and use R14 or even R15 as "stable", which does not > > >>>> make > > >>>> sense. But finally how long will we demos with so old stuff? > > >>>> > > >>>> Opinions? > > >>>> > > >>>> Later I will also put a letsencrypt script to automatically generate > > the > > >>>> certificates (must be done each 3 months) > > >>>> > > >>>> Jacques > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
