Well yes and no, I think there should be a delay to continue the conversation but no assumption of a lazy consensus. As I mentioned earlier, your high level of activity can be overwhelming for regular contributors and offering a delay doesn't remove the amount of time required to respond to the high number of topics you initiate.
If I could offer a single piece of advice to you, it would be to slow down. Work on things that are obviously non-contentious and try to limit the discussions that turn out to be contentious. I'm not saying don't have them, but just try to space them out a bit so regular contributors have time to digest them along with their own interests. Regards Scott On 25/09/2016 20:20, "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > If people see a possible issue or are in doubt with a proposition, I > propose they quickly put a -1 as they would put a +1 on the contrary. > It would not a be vote, but then we would know that there is a kind of > disagreement, but not yet time to explain it clearly. > And we would know we need to wait a bit more than normally and especially > ask the persons who are concerned why they are. > Then we would wait their answers in a reasonable delay. By convention this > would be 3 days. > > I propose this rule to be written in a set of OFBiz specific rules which > AFAIK are still to be written. > So this would be the first and we would create a prominent wiki page for > that. > > I think that by written OFBiz specific rules in a wiki page it will > clarify the situations in most cases. We would of course add new OFBiz > specific rules when a new case would be crossed. > > What do you think? Of course, here again lazy consensus apply > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus but you might > already use the proposition above... > > Jacques > > Le 24/09/2016 à 23:39, Scott Gray a écrit : > >> - I think you rely on lazy consensus too much. Not many contributors have >> as much time as you to give to the project and formulating an argument >> against something (and then continuing the discussion) can take up a lot >> of >> time and energy. In my experience people are generally very quick to >> agree >> to good ideas (because it takes no effort other than to reply +1) so if >> you >> get*no* responses then you should IMO take pause before pushing ahead. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> > >
