On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote:
> [...] > I therefore like to propose to deprecate the mini lang implementation > which means: > > 1. there will be no new implementations based on mini lang accepted to go > into the code base. > > 2. mini lang and mini lang code will be maintained with bug and security > fixes for backwards compatibility and to support existing adopters relying > on mini lang. > There will be no new features though. > > 3. we will continously replace the mini lang implementations with Java > and/or Groovy code. This will be another good opportunity for contributors > to engage in the project. > > +1 Jacopo
