Le 29/04/2017 à 09:07, ta...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: taher
Date: Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017
New Revision: 1793170
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793170&view=rev
Log:
Fixed: Remove all dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins
(OFBIZ-9322)
Further removed dependencies on demo data defined in ecommerce by modifying
the following data items:
- Move the DemoSupplier demo data from ecommerce to accounting
- Move the PartyIdentificationType of "CARD_ID" from ecommerce to party
This brings down total failing tests to only two
Modified:
ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml
ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party/data/PartyDemoData.xml
Modified:
ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml?rev=1793170&r1=1793169&r2=1793170&view=diff
==============================================================================
---
ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml
(original)
+++
ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/data/DemoPaymentsInvoices.xml
Sat Apr 29 07:07:29 2017
@@ -74,13 +74,17 @@ under the License.
<Invoice invoiceId="8001" invoiceTypeId="PURCHASE_INVOICE" partyIdFrom="AcctBigSupplier" partyId="Company" statusId="INVOICE_READY" currencyUomId="USD" invoiceDate="2009-07-06 16:48:40.952" paidDate="2009-07-06 16:52:52.901" dueDate="2009-08-05 16:48:40.952"/>
<InvoiceItem invoiceId="8001" invoiceItemSeqId="1" invoiceItemTypeId="PINV_SURCHARGE_ADJ"
taxableFlag="Y" quantity="1.000000" amount="10.000"/>
-
- <!--
- plugins components are loaded after applications components. DemoSupplier
& AcctBigSupplier data exists in ecommerce component.
- So it creates foreign key violation as accounting component is loaded
first and it tries to find 'DemoSupplier' and 'AcctBigSupplier' party.
- This change will help to load test data without producing any foreign
key error.
- -->
- <Party partyId="DemoSupplier"/>
+
+ <Party partyId="DemoSupplier" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP"/>
+ <PartyGroup partyId="DemoSupplier" groupName="Demo Supplier"/>
+ <PartyRole partyId="DemoSupplier" roleTypeId="SUPPLIER"/>
+ <ContactMech contactMechId="9001" contactMechTypeId="POSTAL_ADDRESS"/>
+ <PartyContactMech partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001" fromDate="2001-05-13
00:00:00.000" allowSolicitation="Y"/>
+ <PostalAddress contactMechId="9001" toName="Demo Supplier Company" address1="2004 Factory Blvd" city="City of
Industry" postalCode="90000" countryGeoId="USA" stateProvinceGeoId="CA"/>
+ <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001"
contactMechPurposeTypeId="BILLING_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000"/>
+ <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001"
contactMechPurposeTypeId="GENERAL_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000"/>
+ <PartyContactMechPurpose partyId="DemoSupplier" contactMechId="9001"
contactMechPurposeTypeId="PAYMENT_LOCATION" fromDate="2001-05-13 00:00:00.000"/>
+ <UserLogin userLoginId="DemoSupplier"
currentPassword="{SHA}47b56994cbc2b6d10aa1be30f70165adb305a41a" partyId="DemoSupplier"/>
<Party partyId="AcctBigSupplier"/>
<!--demo data for testCancelCheckRunPayments-->
Taher, All,
Should this data not better in party component?
Jacques
