Of the four issues observed.
1. is fixed after sync up with master ..fixed
2. Added lifecycle mapping enteries for the maven time stamp and maven
plugin plugin ..looks ok for now
3.After importing I am still getting compilation issue related code
generation for ANTLR, any explicit changes required ?



On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Amend, Christian <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Vikram,
>
> do another git fetch and rebase. There was a bug until 20min ago ☺ If
> there are still issues let me know.
>
> Best Regards,
> Christian
>
> From: Vikram Pancholi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 15:14
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Initial code base import issues
>
> Hi,
>    I have clone the master olingo 4 repo locally. While importing the code
> base i am getting a host of issues. Can you let me know if they are to be
> ignored or there are fixes that i need to apply to my environment.
> PS : I am using Eclipse kepler , jdk 7
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Issue 1 : while executing mvn clean install
>               Test failure at olingo-server-test
> Running org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataHandlerTest
> Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.841 sec
> <<< FA
> ILURE! - in org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataHandlerTest
> testServiceDocumentDefault(org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataHandlerTest)
>  Time
>  elapsed: 0.037 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<application/json[]> but
> was:<application/
> json[;odata.metadata=minimal]>
>         at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:115)
>         at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:144)
>         at
> org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataHandlerTest.testServiceDocumentDef
> ault(ODataHandlerTest.java:85)
>
> Failed tests:
>   ODataHandlerTest.testServiceDocumentDefault:85
> expected:<application/json[]> b
> ut was:<application/json[;odata.metadata=minimal]>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Issue 2 :
>    While importing project using as maven project : Maven Eclipse
> Lifecycle Mapping issues
>
> Description     Resource         Path     Location         Type
> Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration:
> com.keyboardsamurais.maven:maven-timestamp-plugin:1.0:create (execution:
> default, phase: validate)         pom.xml          /olingo-server-tecsvc
>  line 94 Maven Project Build Lifecycle Mapping Problem
> Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration:
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:3.2:helpmojo (execution:
> help-goal, phase: generate-sources)           pom.xml
>  /pojogen-maven-plugin            line 98 Maven Project Build Lifecycle
> Mapping Problem
> Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration:
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:3.2:descriptor (execution:
> default-descriptor, phase: generate-resources)    pom.xml
>  /pojogen-maven-plugin  line 83 Maven Project Build Lifecycle Mapping
> Problem
> Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration:
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:3.2:descriptor (execution:
> mojo-descriptor, phase: process-classes)  pom.xml
>  /pojogen-maven-plugin            line 92 Maven Project Build Lifecycle
> Mapping Problem
>
>
>     [Inline image 3]
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Issue 3: Antlr code generation issue
>    If i ignore above errors i am getting compilation issues seems antlr
> code hasnt been generated.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Issue 4 : Antlr eclipse plugin Error
>   If I use antlr eclipse plugin , with antlr lib 4.2.2. I get code
> generation error/warning as below unable to find  URILexer.token.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Regards,
> Vikram Pancholi
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to