Hi all, Please have a look at [1] so that we have a common understanding of the Apache voting process.
I don't want to stress this to much. We are having a healthy discussion and I am pretty sure that we get a consensus. After that we can do a new vote. Regards, Stephan [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html On 24.07.14 10:29, "Mark Stafford" <[email protected]> wrote: >I'm not asking us to exclude [email protected], just asking to >include a larger community. As far as I can tell there's less than 20 >members on this mailing list and most of us work for Microsoft or SAP so >it's not a good place to get feedback on something as visible as the name >of the library. By contrast odata.org had 61,000 unique visitors in June. >We certainly won't get responses from that many people, but I'd hope we >can get a voting result that includes more than six votes from two >companies. That's not a very representative sample. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kobler-Morris, Sven [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:02 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: Java Script library Name voting result > >Hello Mark, > >think it is best if discussion took place on [email protected], >otherwise we have so sync the discussion between mailing list/blog/forum > >On http://olingo.apache.org/support.html is information of how to join >[email protected]. Any interested developer can join. > >Regards, >Sven > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Stafford [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 09:56 >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: Java Script library Name voting result > >Thanks Sven! Ideally we should consider getting input from the larger >OData community. The current Olingo community is mostly composed of >members of the TC, which I think biases the discussion somewhat. Is there >a way to extend the call for input to the full OData community? Maybe we >could put a blog post up on OData.org and send a mail to the main OData >DL? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kobler-Morris, Sven [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:30 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: Java Script library Name voting result > >Hi all, > >this seems to be a valid point. So I cancelled the vote and we can do >further discussions on this. >From my current point of view ODataJS makes also sense as a name because >it is more releated to "OData" then "Olingo" and will show better up in >Search results ( as Yi mentioned). > >So please free discuss this here. There will be a new Vote on this after >the discussion. > >regards, >Sven > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Yi Ding [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 08:20 >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: Java Script library Name voting result > >Hi all, > >I would propose that we reconsider using the name OData.JS or ODataJS. >OlingoJS certainly got majority of the votes but the number of votes is >small (only 6 votes). > >This JavaScript client library for OData is the core client library for >JavaScript mainly developed by sponsors of the TC of OASIS for OData (at >least this first version), so it qualifies as an official JavaScript >library of OData. Having OData.JS or ODataJS as its name will vastly >increase the possibility that users will turn to our library as the first >choice when he searches on the internet for "OData JavaScript library" >and names like "OData.js", "Breeze.js", "JayData", etc. show up at the >same time. Using OlingoJS will likely to cause brand dilution. Apache >Olingo as the project name is totally respected but having OData as part >of the library name would also be very beneficial. > >It would be really helpful if people voted on OlingoJS can shed light on >your reasons for this choice so that we can discuss about it. > >Best, >Yi > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kobler-Morris, Sven [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 11:02 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Java Script library Name voting result > >Hi, > >for the name the majority is for "OlingoJS". > >So we use OlingoJS as name. > >Regards, >Sven > >-----Original Message----- >From: V.A, Chandan [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Montag, 21. Juli 2014 14:32 >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [VOTE] Java Script library Name > >OlingoJS +1 > >Thanks, >Kind Regards >Chandan VA > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kobler-Morris, Sven [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 2:19 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [VOTE] Java Script library Name > >Hi all, > >below is a list of collected names for the Java Script OData client >library which makes sense from our point of view. For voting please ad a >+1 behind your favorite choice. > >1. datajs >2. OlingoJS > >3. ODataJS > >4. Olingo.OData.JS > > >regards, >Sven
