scratch that, I see some other classes with Edm prefix already. Surely as you can see even after looking at the code for sometime I still get confused with similarly named classes. Renaming them to correctly represent their function is really going help understand for service developers IMO. I understand they are in different packages, but does not do whole lot of good.
I am still learning -:) Ramesh.. ----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > Since we are refactoring lot of common-api, common-core code, is it possible > to rename classes in "org.apache.olingo.commons.api.edm.provider" package in > the common-api module to prefix something like "Edm", so they are EdmAction, > EdmActionImport etc? I always get confused which classes to select when some > of the classes with same name show up from > "org.apache.olingo.commons.api.data" package. By adding this prefix, it > would be much more clear IMO. > > what do you guys think? > > Ramesh.. > http://teiid.org > >
