Ok, let's do a separation by repository and change from https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-olingo.git
to https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-olingo-odata2.git @mentors: What is the recommendation to get this changed? Regards, Stephan On 15.07.13 10:38, "Amend, Christian" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >I also think we should have two repositories (one for v2 and one for v4). >This way changes is the v2 code won´t cause merge conflicts for v4 code >which could be annoying. > >What would be the best way to ask infrastructure about this? Is it even >possible to request two distinct git repositories for one project? > >Best Regards, >Christian > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Montag, 15. Juli 2013 10:12 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Git Repository > >Hi, > >In my opinion we should try to get an additional git repository so that we >have a clear separation between v2 and v4 version. >Or is it final that we only get this single git repo? > >Perhaps till the second repository is created we can start with v2 in the >already available repo. > >Kind regards, >Michael > > > > > >On 15.07.13 10:06, "Klevenz, Stephan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Infrastructure has created a Git repository for Olingo: >> >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-olingo.git >> >>Unfortunately it is not exact what we have proposed. The basic idea was >>to have to repositories where one keeps the code for OData V2.0 library >>and another one for future OData V4.0 development. Now we have only one >>repository. >> >>I would like to propose the following file structure for the repository: >> >>root/odata2/ >> - pom.xml >> - /src >>root/odata4/ >> - pom.xml >> - /src >> >>Basically I would like to introduce the protocol versioning on the first >>level of the repository where each version has its own parent pom.xml. >>With that it should be possible to develop in two tracks which can >>release independently. Drawback is that each git branch will contain both >>protocol versions which is sometimes unneeded. >> >>Maybe someone has a better idea. Or maybe having two separate >>repositories is the cleaner way but the we have to ask infrastructure >>again to do a change. >> >>WDYT? >> >>Regards, >>Stephan >
