Hi,

I suggest to do as Florian has proposed. I will do another ZIP with
packaging org.apache.olingo + Apache header. All the rest can be community
work.

WDYT?

Stephan

On 24.07.13 07:43, "V.A, Chandan" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi all,
>We need to refactor not just the package name but also the artifact id in
>case of JPA processor library.
>
>@Stephan,
>You had initially proposed changes to artifact id in case of JPA
>processor library to align with OData Lib. Do we need to do that now in
>GITHUB first or do it after initial commit.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Kind Regards
>Chandan VA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:39 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: initial code contribution
>
>Hi Florian,
>
>Wouldn't it be better to do it after the initial commit?
>So we have this part of history which could help to link to the (a little
>messy) history on GitHub.
>
>Or we do the changes on GitHub on then do the initial commit. I think this
>could be a good solution.
>
>By the way I have attached a small script for package renaming to the JIRA
>issue.
>
>Kind regards,
>Michael
>
>
>
>On 23.07.13 18:14, "Florian Müller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Stephan,
>>
>>Before we check the code into the Apache Git, we should make a few
>>general changes to it.
>>We should have at least the Apache header in each source file. It would
>>also be good to change package names to something like
>>"org.apache.olingo...".
>>
>>
>>Florian
>>
>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to