Hi, I would move to "line wrapping policy" and "120 chars". I agree to Francesco that 120 seems to be quite commonly accepted. Best regards, Jens.
-----Original Message----- From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Mittwoch, 7. August 2013 06:15 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: code style Hi, It will not be easy to find a solution which is acceptable for all. But currently it seems so: "line wrapping policy": +4 "80 chars": +1 (if possible I would give here a -1/veto ;o) ) "135 chars": +1 "135 chars": +2 I think we should wait till this weekend and then decide by majority. Can everybody agree with this or is somebody opposed? Kind regard, Michael On 05.08.13 13:17, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, >I would personally move to 120 characters rather than 135: the former >seems to be quite commonly accepted as extension of traditional 80. > >Regards. > >On 05/08/2013 12:54, Chauhan, Chitresh wrote: >> Hi, >> For me its : >> Line wrapping policy(wrap when necessary) and 135 chars.. >> >> Best regards, >> Chitresh >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 3:58 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: code style >> >> Hi, >> >> In my opinion we could define a "line wrapping policy". But for me is a >> line width of 80 chars much to low. >> I think today normally at each monitor (> 19") you can handle ~135 chars >> without scrolling. >> >> So for me: >> +1: "line wrapping policy" >> -1: "80 chars" >> +1: "135 chars" >> >> Any other opinions? >> >> Kind regards, >> Michael
