[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13937551#comment-13937551
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò commented on OLINGO-191:
-----------------------------------------------
As said previously, I don't see any advantage in this.
Using at least something like as {{org.apache.olingo.client.api.edm.current}}
looks a bit better.
Again, I'd suggest you to wait for the merge from ODataJClient to finish before
entering in such package renaming: doing so, you will help reducing the effort
currently required to translate ODataJClient's code to Olingo.
> use general namespace for lastest version.
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OLINGO-191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-191
> Project: Olingo
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: odata4-client
> Affects Versions: V4 0.1.0
> Reporter: Challen
> Fix For: V4 0.1.0
>
>
> open this JIRA for versioning namespaces [1].
> For example:
> org.apache.olingo.odata4.client.api.edm
> org.apache.olingo.odata4.client.api.edm.v3
> org.apache.olingo.odata4.client.api.edm.v4
> ==>
> org.apache.olingo.client.api.edm.shared
> org.apache.olingo.client.api.edm.v3 - for v3
> org.apache.olingo.client.api.edm - for v4
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/27ctcvjmujbii6po
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
