Hi Jasha, makes sense, let's go with 1.0.2 then will come out with a 1.0.3 Thanks for the suggestion! -Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you changing your own vote to a -1? Otherwise I'd prefer to go on with > the release to let people profit from its features, then fix the new issues > and release v1.0.3. > > My €0.02. > > Jasha > > On 20 June 2016 at 12:45, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > due to the recent open issues, I'd propose to cancel this vote, take > > advantage to fix some issues then re-submitting a new release candidate. > > WDYT? > > TIA, > > -Simo > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Simone Tripodi < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We solved N issues: > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314420&version=12334954 > > > > > > SVN source tag (r9999999): > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/tags/org.apache.oltu.oauth2.parent-1.0.2/ > > > > > > Staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoltu-1010 > > > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 48CF8630): > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/oltu/KEYS > > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1, let's get it ruuuumbleeeeee!!! > > > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... > > > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > > > > >
