[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16249533#comment-16249533
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on OMID-78:
------------------------------------
Github user ebortnik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-omid/pull/16#discussion_r150531893
--- Diff:
hbase-coprocessor/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionAccessWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Get;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTableInterface;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Put;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Result;
+import org.apache.omid.transaction.TableAccessWrapper;
+
+public class RegionAccessWrapper implements TableAccessWrapper {
--- End diff --
High level comment please
> Identify transaction snapshot at the server
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OMID-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-78
> Project: Apache Omid
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ohad Shacham
> Assignee: Ohad Shacham
>
> To identify a transaction's snapshot in scans and gets, Omid reads and filter
> cells at the client side. This filtering requires checking the shadow cells
> and accessing the commit table if needed.
> Doing the filtering at the server side should be more efficient since less
> data is being transferred to the client and also, in some cases, RPCs are
> being saved.
> This feature requires implementing a coprocessor that will do the filtering
> at the server side and returns only the relevant snapshot to the client side.
> This feature is also needed to support the integration of Omid with Phoenix.
> This is required since Phoenix has coprocessors that change and condence the
> data returned to the client and therefore, filtering at the client side in
> this case is impossible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
