On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Daniel Manzke <[email protected]> wrote: > I would start with 0.1, because each module should be reviewed. If done the > version number can be update to a version reflecting the state. > But it would be cool, if after the review and for the final voting as a TLP > all would have atleast 1.0?
I don't think we'll manage that - most likely we will become a TLP even with some unreleased components? I actually expect - given an active community - we will leave the incubator after 2 or 3 component releases Cheers Christian > > Wdyt? > > Von meinem iPad gesendet > > Am 26.11.2012 um 16:28 schrieb Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>: > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Simone Tripodi >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> >>> when importing the codebase, I thought about the following mapping: >>> >>> * groupId/package: org.99soft.guice.{component} became >>> org.apache.onami.{component} >>> >>> * artifactId: >>> >>> g-guava -> onami-guava >>> guartz -> onami-scheduler >>> gspi -> onami-spi >>> junice -> onami-test >>> lifegycle -> onami-lifecycle >>> rocoto -> onami-configuration >>> sli4j -> onami-logging >>> gache -> onami-cache >>> autobind -> onami-autobind >>> >>> * versioning: kept the versions coming from the donated codebase. >>> >>> Do you agree on that mappings or versions should start from 0.1? >> >> I am fine with all above, including to keep the versions from the >> original codebase. Versions usually reflect some kind of stability >> (0.1 does sound pretty alpha, 0.8 sounds like somebody kept on >> working, 2.3 sounds like pretty stable). >> >> I don't see a benefit on starting all over from 0.1 but some benefits >> from reflecting how much work has happened already. Since we lost git >> history, it is the only indicator for a quick check >> >> Cheers >> >>> TIA, >>> -Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
