"Rocoto" class is not really about configuration, but more about "expanding" named strings. Perhaps a name more related to that functionality would be better, e.g: ConfigurationExpander, ConstantEnhancer, etc.
2012/11/27 Daniel Manzke <[email protected]> > That's true man ;) > > > 2012/11/27 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> > > > But there is also Configuration in the package. > > And while we are at it... there is method name configure. > > > > so it would read like: > > o.a.onami.configuration.Configuration::configure > > > > Maybe we cannot avoid it, but its not so pretty > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Simone Tripodi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > yeah, agreed! :) > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Manzke > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> For me Configuration or something else would be better due to the fact > > that there is Onami already in the package. > > >> > > >> Von meinem iPad gesendet > > >> > > >> Am 26.11.2012 um 17:31 schrieb Simone Tripodi < > [email protected] > > >: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> What we inherited from donated codebase is the following class > > >>> > > >>> org.nnsoft.guice.rocoto.Rocoto > > >>> > > >>> now under > > >>> > > >>> org.apache.onami.configuration.Rocoto > > >>> > > >>> Shall we rename to > > >>> > > >>> org.apache.onami.configuration.OnamiConfiguration > > >>> > > >>> ? TIA! > > >>> -Simo > > >>> > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > >>> http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.grobmeier.de > > https://www.timeandbill.de > > > > > > -- > Viele Grüße/Best Regards > > Daniel Manzke >
