On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>wrote:

> agreed :)
>
> I am not aware if, when releasing a parent, the lazy consensus is
> valid or we have to pass the IPMC vote as well.
>
> Mentors?
>
>
I think we need IPMC votes for every release. It should be no problem since
Oliviers and my vote are already IPMC votes. We just need a single one
more, and since parent is pretty small...

Cheers


> TIA, all the best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > release early, release often.
> > And with the first release of parent, we can get rid of the aggregator
> and
> > the relative statements.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Simone Tripodi <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all guys,
> >>
> >> is there anything else you want to discuss about the parent before
> >> releasing the first version?
> >>
> >> It looks like clean/complete ATM, but nothing prevents to release new
> >> versions while working toward components releases...
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >> TIA!
> >> -Simo
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.grobmeier.de
> > https://www.timeandbill.de
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

Reply via email to