Hi all again, I didn't receive any blocker (yet) so I am going to switch naming convention tonight.
Please stop me before if you don't agree (and please explain why) :) all the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > looks like that having the groupId in the artifact name is a common > practice in eclipse plugins[1] and apache aries and sling[2] just to > mention some popular OSGi projects. > > To reply to Olivier's questions: > >> * change version scheme > > I think that switching to the semantic versioning scheme should not a > pain at the current status, if we all agree that 0.1 means 0.1.0 > >> * generate correct MANIFEST.MF > > The bundle-plugin is already plugged in order to generate the OSGi > metadata in the manifest, what is missing is taking care of reviewing > them for each component... > > thoughts? > TIA, have a nice saturday night fever! :) > -Simo > > [1] https://gist.github.com/4242093 > [2] https://gist.github.com/4242116 > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2012/12/8 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: >>> Hi all guys, >>> >>> I had a second thought on that and, while studying new topics at work, >>> I changed my mind... I don't know what is your position about but - >>> maybe Daniel agrees with me :P - but I'd propose a different way to >>> rename artifactIds, a la OSGi, as shown below... >>> >>> WDYT? do you have any opinion/objection? >> >> -0 Perso I found this naming very redundant with the groupId. >> >> But I won't complain too much if you really want that :-) >> >> BTW if using osgi conventions (not sure it's a convention or usage or >> something else) we must: >> * change version scheme >> * generate correct MANIFEST.MF >> >> >>> Many thanks in advance! >>> -Simo >>> >>> onami-parent -> org.apache.onami.parent >>> >>> onami-autobind-parent -> org.apache.onami.autobind.parent >>> onami-autobind-aop -> org.apache.onami.autobind.aop >>> onami-autobind-core -> org.apache.onami.autobind.core >>> onami-scanner-parent -> org.apache.onami.autobind.scanner.parent >>> onami-scanner-asm -> org.apache.onami.autobind.scanner.asm >>> onami-autobind-configuration -> org.apache.onami.autobind.configuration >>> onami-autobind-tests -> org.apache.onami.autobind.test >>> >>> onami-cache -> org.apache.onami.cache >>> >>> onami-configuration -> org.apache.onami.configuration >>> >>> onami-guava -> org.apache.onami.guava >>> >>> onami-lifecycle -> org.apache.onami.lifecycle >>> >>> onami-logging-parent -> org.apache.onami.logging.parent >>> onami-logging-acl -> org.apache.onami.logging.acl >>> onami-logging-core -> org.apache.onami.logging.core >>> onami-logging-juli -> org.apache.onami.logging.juli >>> onami-logging-log4j -> org.apache.onami.logging.log4j >>> onami-logging-log4j2 -> org.apache.onami.logging.log4j2 >>> onami-logging-slf4j -> org.apache.onami.logging.slf4j >>> onami-logging-testfw -> org.apache.onami.logging.testfw >>> >>> onami-scheduler -> org.apache.onami.scheduler >>> >>> onami-spi -> org.apache.onami.spi >>> >>> onami-test -> org.apache.onami.test >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Christian Grobmeier >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Autobind: >>>> >>>> <artifactId>autobind-parent</artifactId> >>>> >>>> Loggin: >>>> >>>> <artifactId>onami-logging-log4j</artifactId> >>>> <artifactId>onami-logging-parent</artifactId> >>>> >>>> Can we agree on either prefixing everything with onami or with >>>> removing the prefix for every component? >>>> >>>> As there is a groupId containing org.apache.onami I would prefer >>>> removing the prefix >>>> >>>> Any objections? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>> https://www.timeandbill.de >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
