Hi Jordi! thanks a lot in advance for taking care of it!
Yes, it would be excellent if every action is backed by a JIRA issue, it would help on keeping track about all modifications to the codebase. All the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Jordi Gerona <[email protected]> wrote: > I can volunteer to migrate onami-logging with onami-test, shall I create an > issue? > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi my friend! >> >> > nice idea... I took a look to onami unit tests and it's quite simple >> introduce onami-test framework into the tests that already exist. >> >> cool! I am strongly convinced using the OnamiRunner should simplify >> current tests readability/maintenance, let's working toward the first >> release! >> >> > The only module that doesn't use JUnit is onami-logging. It uses testNg. >> >> not a big deal, I think that migrating onami-logging to onami-test >> should be easy enough. >> >> > Maybe is a little bit off topic for Onami, but in the future, we could >> modify onami-test (or create a new onami module) to extends testng guice >> integration for supporting the Mock Injection. >> >> not off topic, it is still related to onami-test; +1 from my side!!! >> >> Thanks and all the best! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >>
