just have a look at how the logging module has been organized... I like the modules granularization here, where users include only the logger they need, keeping outside what is unneeded.
-Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Salut mon ami! > > not only I would move the converters package to a 'TLP' > org.apache.onami.converters module, I would even split converters in > different small submodules, so users bring just the converters they > need. > > Let's say someone just needs a DateConverter... which is the sense of > including all the converters in the application? > Something suggests me we should take more care about modularization... > does it make sense? > > TIA, all the best! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Eric Charles <[email protected]> wrote: >> btw, sitebricks for which I have just created a pull-request for validation >> with bval-guice [1] has a dedicated module for convertion [2]. >> >> So it confirms convertion deserves a dedicated module. >> >> Thx, Eric >> >> [1] https://github.com/echarles/sitebricks/tree/validation >> [2] https://github.com/dhanji/sitebricks/tree/master/sitebricks-converter >> >> >> >> On 02/02/2013 13:27, Eric Charles wrote: >>> >>> Hi Simo, >>> >>> Do you mean moving to a toplevel onami module >>> (org.apache.onami.converters)? >>> >>> Just asking to be sure, but it makes sense to me as any other module >>> potentially need convertion. >>> >>> Thx, Eric >>> >>> >>> On 02/02/2013 12:13, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all guys, >>>> >>>> I wonder if it would make sense extracting the converters from >>>> [configuration] in separated modules - my objective is defining all >>>> that modules in a fine granularization in order that users just >>>> include in their application what they really need, and not everything >>>> by default. >>>> >>>> So I'd move all converters in a separated branch with sub-module. >>>> >>>> Do you have any observation on that? >>>> TIA and have a nice WE, >>>> -Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>
