-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated 2012-05-27 05:35:54.936237)


Review request for oodt, brian Foster, Ricky Nguyen, Paul Ramirez, Sheryl John, 
and Thomas Bennett.


Changes
-------

Updated with suggestions from bfoster, and sherylj.
  - created WorkflowProcessorBuilder class
  - updated and fixed race condition in QuerierThread (now return a copy)
  - updated condition checking (e.g., using isEmpty rather than ==0)
  - adding check for isNull (assert) in unit test
  - added not done processor

All unit tests now pass. I'd like to commit this in the next 24 hours.


Summary
-------

Task Querier thread for OODT-310. See javadocs on: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/oodt-trunk/javadoc/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskQuerier.html


This addresses bug OODT-310.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-310


Diffs (updated)
-----

  
./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/ParallelProcessor.java
 1342993 
  
./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/SequentialProcessor.java
 1342993 
  
./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskProcessor.java
 1342993 
  
./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskQuerier.java
 1342993 
  
./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/WorkflowProcessor.java
 1342993 
  
./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/WorkflowProcessorBuilder.java
 PRE-CREATION 
  
./trunk/workflow/src/test/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TestTaskQuerier.java
 PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/diff


Testing
-------

Includes unit test, that currently isn't passing. I think I know why (something 
up with my threading logic and synchronized keywords) but wanted to throw it up 
for review. I'll likely be working on this tomorrow or the following evening.


Thanks,

Chris

Reply via email to