Great work Lewis and team.

We now need to update the release guide and SCM help pages on
the website.

I will try and do so later today or tomorrow if no one beats me to it.

Cheers,
Chris

—
Chris Mattmann
[email protected]






-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:28 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Move Apache OODT SCM to Apache Git

>Hi Everyone,
>Our SVN repository is now read only.
>Infra has sorted this out for us via
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10495
>Can as many people as possible please check out the read only .git repos
>at
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt.git
>We need to verify that it looks as expected, we have not lost any
>branches,
>trunk is up-to-date, etc.
>If you an write back here ASAP it would be very much appreciated.
>I have undertaken a provisional peek and it looks good to me.
>the old trunk [0] now exists as master [1]
>Thanks
>Lewis
>
>[0] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/trunk/
>[1]
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=oodt.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/mas
>ter;hb=refs/heads/master
>
>
>On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
>[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Lewis, please keep me posted since I will need to update my SCM
>> stuff.
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Barber <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:56 AM
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Move Apache OODT SCM to Apache Git
>>
>> >This vote makes me so happy I could cry....! ;)
>> >
>> >On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> >[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Team,
>> >> This RESULT thread marks this VOTE as closed as 72hrs has lapsed.
>> >> Thank you to everyone that VOTE'd.
>> >> The results are as follows
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [9] +1, Let's do it
>> >> Chris A. Mattmann*
>> >> Sean Kelly*
>> >> Lewis J. McGibbney*
>> >> Luca Cinquini*
>> >> Sheryl John*
>> >> Tom Barber*
>> >> Jimmy Joyce
>> >> Paul M. Ramirez*
>> >> Thomas Bennett*
>> >>
>> >> [0] +/-0 I couldn't care but would like to say the following...
>> >> [0] -1 I VOTE against this, please provide reasoning.
>> >>
>> >> *PMC BInding
>> >>
>> >> So, it looks like we are moving to Git.
>> >> I'll log a ticket with INFRA and get this established.
>> >> Thanks folks, have a great weekend.
>> >> Lewis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Folks,
>> >> > Lets have a formal VOTE on the above topic further to our DISCUSS
>> >>thread
>> >> > [0].
>> >> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >> >
>> >> > VOTE to move the Apache OODT source code management from SVN to Git
>> >> >
>> >> > [ ] +1, Let's do it
>> >> > [ ] +/-0 I couldn't care but would like to say the following...
>> >> > [ ] -1 I VOTE against this, please provide reasoning.
>> >> >
>> >> > VOTE's carried over from the DISCUSS thread are as follows
>> >> >
>> >> > Chris A. Mattmann
>> >> > Sean Kelly
>> >> > Lewis J. McGibbney
>> >> > Luca Cinquini
>> >> > Sheryl John
>> >> > Tom Barber
>> >> > Jimmy Joyce
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> > Lewis
>> >> >
>> >> > [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40oodt.apache.org/msg05779.html
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > *Lewis*
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> *Lewis*
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>*Lewis*


Reply via email to