are you saying we should switch to Java8? If so, I’m fine with that.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 7/15/16, 7:14 AM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> wrote: >Lucene 6.1.0 seems to be min Java 8, which makes it our minimum version. >Personally I don't have a problem with it 6 and 7 are both EOL. If someone >complains vehemently we'll have to downgrade the lucene upgrade.
