yeah, we'd have to figure out when lucene switched to java8 and use the release before that one.
On 15 Jul 2016 18:23, "Chris Mattmann" <[email protected]> wrote: > I would get some more feedback, 48-72 hours, then go ahead > and switch if there are no objections. > > note subject line change. > > — > Chris Mattmann > [email protected] > > > > > > > > On 7/15/16, 10:17 AM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Jenkins won't compile with anything older. so, yeah > > > >On 15 Jul 2016 17:46, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" < > >[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> are you saying we should switch to Java8? > >> > >> If so, I’m fine with that. > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Chief Architect > >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > >> Email: [email protected] > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/15/16, 7:14 AM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >Lucene 6.1.0 seems to be min Java 8, which makes it our minimum > version. > >> >Personally I don't have a problem with it 6 and 7 are both EOL. If > someone > >> >complains vehemently we'll have to downgrade the lucene upgrade. > >> > >
