Alrighty that’s a wrap.
This vote passes with 3 +1’s
I’ll get it shipped
On 3 October 2019 at 07:07:04, Imesha Sudasingha (ime...@apache.org) wrote:
Their is an uncertainty attached to the failing test case. The test case
does the following,
- Fires and even named "long" which should initialize two workflow
instances of the type "longWorkflow" (according to events.xml).
- Within the test case, we get the number of workflow instances from
workflow manager (directly, not through client)
- Then assert if it is 2
The problem is, the time gap between firing the event and getting number of
instances may not be enough to get 2 workflow instances to get created.
Therefore we get only 1 instance sometimes and the test fails. So the
consistent solution will be to add a timeout between firing even and
checking number of instances.
What do you think?
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 22:34, Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote:
Imesha, isn’t the the exact opposite of the test result you just fixed?
On 2 October 2019 at 17:38:21, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org)
wrote:
OK tests are still failing. Sigh.
[INFO] Running
org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.system.TestAvroRpcWorkflowManager
[ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
1.643 s <<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.system.TestAvroRpcWorkflowManager
[ERROR]
testGetWorkflowInstances(org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.system.TestAvroRpcWorkflowManager)
Time elapsed: 1.617 s <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2> but was:<1>
at
org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.system.TestAvroRpcWorkflowManager.testGetWorkflowInstances(TestAvroRpcWorkflowManager.java:71)
also it hung and I had to quit:
[INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.527 s - in
org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.engine.TestThreadPoolWorkflowEngine
[INFO] Running
org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.engine.TestAsynchronousLocalEngineRunner
[INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.625 s - in
org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.engine.TestAsynchronousLocalEngineRunner
[INFO] Running org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.engine.TestTaskRunner
^C[INFO]
[INFO] Results:
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR] TestAvroRpcWorkflowManager.testGetWorkflowInstances:71
expected:<2>
but was:<1>
[INFO]
[ERROR] Tests run: 115, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 9
[INFO]
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ git branch
* (HEAD detached at 1.9-rc4)
0.12-release
1.2.1
OODT-967
OODT-972
OODT-973
OODT-978
asf-site
development
feature/zookeeper-config
master
merge-avro-dynworkflow
regex-exclude-merge
release-1.2.3
site-dev
upreadme
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_212"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 1.8.0_212-b03)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.212-b03, mixed mode)
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ mvn -V
Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc8e6af555;
2019-04-04T12:00:29-07:00)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_212, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-8.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.14.6", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk>
Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 9:18 AM
To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4
https://github.com/apache/oodt/commits/1.9
You can see Imesha’s fix in the list from 2 days ago.
Which test failed?
On 2 October 2019 at 17:12:54, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org)
wrote:
OK another build failure, note in Workflow this time. I am on the 1.9
detached tag:
[INFO] CAS File Manager Browser Web App ................... SKIPPED
[INFO] CAS Workflow Manager Monitor Web App ............... SKIPPED
[INFO] CAS Product Server Web Application ................. SKIPPED
[INFO] CAS Workflow REST Services ......................... SKIPPED
[INFO] Process Control System Operator Interface Webapp ... SKIPPED
[INFO] OODT Process Control System JAX-RS service layer ... SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache OODT ........................................ SKIPPED
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 06:43 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-10-02T09:08:20-07:00
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.0:test (default-test)
on project cas-workflow: There are test failures.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] Please refer to
/Users/mattmann/git/oodt/workflow/target/surefire-reports for the
individual test results.
[ERROR] Please refer to dump files (if any exist) [date]-jvmRun[N].dump,
[date].dumpstream and [date]-jvmRun[N].dumpstream.
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
-e
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException
[ERROR]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
command
[ERROR] mvn <goals> -rf :cas-workflow
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ git branch
* (HEAD detached at 1.9)
0.12-release
1.2.1
OODT-967
OODT-972
OODT-973
OODT-978
asf-site
development
feature/zookeeper-config
master
merge-avro-dynworkflow
regex-exclude-merge
release-1.2.3
site-dev
Is there a possibility Tom didn’t push Imesha’s fix and create a new tag?
From: Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 9:08 AM
To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Cc: Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4
It is building further now and I already had brew cask. I am going to
update the wiki with
the export command to build b/c it is something we will want to capture.
Speaking of which I don’t have perms to edit the wiki anymore. Imesha or
Tom can you
can me perms?
From: Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 6:42 PM
To: dev <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Cc: Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4
Hi Chris,
I think from jdk 10 or 11, xml related libraries (jaxb) have been removed
from default libraries. That's why you should be getting that error. By
the
look, it seems like an XML related issue.
Thanks,
Imesha
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, 3:21 am Tom Barber, <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote:
brew tap caskroom/versions
brew cask install java8
I think
export JAVA_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8`
On 1 October 2019 at 22:42:42, Mattmann, Chris A (US 1761) (
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov.invalid) wrote:
Any links to install one that old on mac?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 1, 2019, at 2:28 PM, Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote:
8, 9 I think will be okay 10+ will be questionable due the change in API
and jars that need upgrading for compatibility.
On 1 October 2019 at 21:58:35, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org)
wrote:
OK so I need JDK8 to build, is that right?
From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk>
Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 1:57 PM
To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>, Imesha
Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4
Yeah, I’m amazed you got that far through with 12. I know from other apps
migrating from 8 through 12 is a right PITA and something we should look
at
for 2.0.
On 1 October 2019 at 21:48:08, Chris Mattmann (mattm...@apache.org)
wrote:
Pom shouldn’t be a blocker.
Here is my Java version am I using the right one?
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ java -version
openjdk version "12.0.1" 2019-04-16
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 12.0.1+12)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 12.0.1+12, mixed mode, sharing)
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$
Should I switch?
From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk>
Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 1:41 PM
To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4
Results :
Tests run: 65, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 14.723 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-10-01T22:39:58+02:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 15M/353M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(superset) bugg@spicule-dev:~/oodt/commons>
So I can’t replicate Chris’ test failure either, and you’re right Imesha
the pom asc appears to be a copy of the pom, but I’ve not touched it so I
don’t know why that would be.
Does a missing pom asc mean a failed release? I’ve honestly no idea. It
would be easier to fix these in 2.x.
Tom
On 1 October 2019 at 19:36:43, Imesha Sudasingha (ime...@apache.org)
wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the release. Builds fine for me.
One concern: oodt-1.9.pom.asc seems to be a copy of the pom itself. Not
the
signature
Could you check that?
Thanks,
Imesha
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 10:32, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
Release checks out, but I get a test error:
Running org.apache.oodt.commons.util.XMLTest
Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.323 sec
<<< FAILURE!
Running org.apache.oodt.commons.io.FixedBufferOutputStreamTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.031 sec
Running org.apache.oodt.commons.MultiServerTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.177 sec
Running org.apache.oodt.commons.util.Base64Test
Tests run: 1, Failures:
Here is the RC verify checksums and MD5, and SIG:
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ /Users/mattmann/bin/stage_apache_rc
apache-oodt 1.9-src https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left
Speed
100 14.6M 100 14.6M 0 0 1869k 0 0:00:08 0:00:08 --:--:--
1948k
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left
Speed
100 473 100 473 0 0 2654 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
2657
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ ls
apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip.asc
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ $HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs
Verifying Signature for file apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip'
gpg: Signature made Mon Sep 30 06:40:14 2019 PDT
gpg: using RSA key AC57783AB30355CA
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ curl -O
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/oodt/master/KEYS
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left
Speed
100 26954 100 26954 0 0 68787 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
68936
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ gpg --import < KEY
-bash: KEY: No such file or directory
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ gpg --import < KEYS
gpg: key 70F09CC6B876884A: "Chris Mattmann (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
mattm...@apache.org>" not changed
gpg: key 170B657EF9D98BFA: public key "Sean Colin-Patrick Kelly (CODE
SIGNING KEY) <ke...@apache.org>" imported
gpg: key 11911679FF5B0BD5: public key "David Woollard (CODE SIGNING KEY)
<
wooll...@apache.org>" imported
gpg: key A5DBC0182C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING
KEY) <prami...@apache.org>" imported
gpg: key 7189700880EF652D: public key "Andrew Hart (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
ah...@apache.org>" imported
gpg: key D8167171783CE7BB: public key "Tom Barber (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
magicaltr...@apache.org>" imported
gpg: key 4EAAF8B60C1E654B: "Chris Mattmann (CODE SIGNING KEY - Apr 2016)
<
mattm...@apache.org>" not changed
gpg: key 2B12271BFD01FEDB: "Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>" not
changed
gpg: key AC57783AB30355CA: public key "Tom Barber <
magicaltr...@apache.org>"
imported
gpg: Total number processed: 9
gpg: imported: 6
gpg: unchanged: 3
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ ls
KEYS apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip
apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip.asc
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ $HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs
Verifying Signature for file apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip'
gpg: Signature made Mon Sep 30 06:40:14 2019 PDT
gpg: using RSA key AC57783AB30355CA
gpg: Good signature from "Tom Barber <magicaltr...@apache.org>"
[unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 65C4 6FC2 31C7 756A E60D B307 AC57 783A B303
55CA
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ verify_md5_sigs
-bash: verify_md5_sigs: command not found
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ verify_md5_checksums
-bash: verify_md5_checksums: command not found
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$ $HOME/bin/verify_md5_checksums
md5sum: '*.tar.gz': No such file or directory
md5sum: '*.bz2': No such file or directory
md5sum: '*.tgz': No such file or directory
apache-oodt-1.9-src.zip: OK
pomodoro:apache-oodt-1.9 mattmann$
Can you please recheck why the test is failing?
pomodoro:oodt mattmann$ cat
commons/target/surefire-reports/TEST-org.apache.oodt.commons.util.XMLTest.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<testsuite tests="9" failures="1"
name="org.apache.oodt.commons.util.XMLTest" time="0.319" errors="0"
skipped="0">
<properties>
<property name="java.runtime.name" value="OpenJDK Runtime
Environment"/>
<property name="java.vm.version" value="12.0.1+12"/>
<property name="sun.boot.library.path"
value="/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-12.0.1.jdk/Contents/Home/lib"/>
<property name="maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory"
value="/Users/mattmann/git/oodt"/>
<property name="java.vm.vendor" value="Oracle Corporation"/>
<property name="java.vendor.url" value="https://java.oracle.com/"/>
<property name="guice.disable.misplaced.annotation.check"
value="true"/>
<property name="path.separator" value=":"/>
<property name="java.vm.name" value="OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM"/>
<property name="java.util.logging.config.file"
value="/Users/mattmann/git/oodt/commons/src/test/resources/test.logging.properties"/>
<property name="user.country" value="US"/>
<property name="sun.java.launcher" value="SUN_STANDARD"/>
<property name="java.vm.specification.name" value="Java Virtual
Machine Specification"/>
<property name="user.dir" value="/Users/mattmann/git/oodt/commons"/>
<property name="java.vm.compressedOopsMode" value="Zero based"/>
<property name="java.runtime.version" value="12.0.1+12"/>
<property name="java.awt.graphicsenv"
value="sun.awt.CGraphicsEnvironment"/>
<property name="basedir" value="/Users/mattmann/git/oodt/commons"/>
<property name="os.arch" value="x86_64"/>
<property name="java.io.tmpdir"
value="/var/folders/n5/1d_k3z4s2293q8ntx_n8sw54mm5n_8/T/"/>
<property name="line.separator" value="
"/>
<property name="java.vm.specification.vendor" value="Oracle
Corporation"/>
<property name="os.name" value="Mac OS X"/>
<property name="classworlds.conf"
value="/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec/bin/m2.conf"/>
<property name="sun.jnu.encoding" value="UTF-8"/>
<property name="java.library.path"
value="/Users/mattmann/Library/Java/Extensions:/Library/Java/Extensions:/Network/Library/Java/Extensions:/System/Library/Java/Extensions:/usr/lib/java:."/>
<property name="maven.conf"
value="/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec/conf"/>
<property name="jdk.debug" value="release"/>
<property name="java.class.version" value="56.0"/>
<property name="java.specification.name" value="Java Platform API
Specification"/>
<property name="sun.management.compiler" value="HotSpot 64-Bit Tiered
Compilers"/>
<property name="os.version" value="10.14.6"/>
<property name="library.jansi.path"
value="/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec/lib/jansi-native"/>
<property name="user.home" value="/Users/mattmann"/>
<property name="user.timezone" value="America/Los_Angeles"/>
<property name="file.encoding" value="UTF-8"/>
<property name="java.specification.version" value="12"/>
<property name="user.name" value="mattmann"/>
<property name="java.class.path"
value="/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec/boot/plexus-classworlds-2.6.0.jar"/>
<property name="java.vm.specification.version" value="12"/>
<property name="sun.arch.data.model" value="64"/>
<property name="sun.java.command"
value="org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher clean install"/>
<property name="java.home"
value="/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-12.0.1.jdk/Contents/Home"/>
<property name="user.language" value="en"/>
<property name="java.specification.vendor" value="Oracle Corporation"/>
<property name="awt.toolkit" value="sun.lwawt.macosx.LWCToolkit"/>
<property name="java.vm.info" value="mixed mode, sharing"/>
<property name="java.version" value="12.0.1"/>
<property name="java.vendor" value="Oracle Corporation"/>
<property name="maven.home"
value="/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec"/>
<property name="localRepository"
value="/Users/mattmann/.m2/repository"/>
<property name="file.separator" value="/"/>
<property name="java.version.date" value="2019-04-16"/>
<property name="java.vendor.url.bug" value="
https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/"/>
<property name="sun.io.unicode.encoding" value="UnicodeBig"/>
<property name="sun.cpu.endian" value="little"/>
</properties>
<testcase name="testDOM" time="0.281">
<failure message="Stringified DOM document CRC mismatch, got value =
2790989364"
type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Stringified DOM document CRC mismatch, got value = 2790989364
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:57)
at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:22)
at junit.framework.TestCase.assertTrue(TestCase.java:192)
at org.apache.oodt.commons.util.XMLTest.testDOM(XMLTest.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:567)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:176)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:141)
at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:122)
at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:142)
at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:125)
at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:129)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:252)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:247)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:86)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:165)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:107)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:567)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:285)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:976)
</failure>
</testcase>
<testcase name="testDump" time="0.004"/>
<testcase name="testDocumentCreation" time="0.001"/>
<testcase name="testSAXParser" time="0.003"/>
<testcase name="testAddObject" time="0.001"/>
<testcase name="testAddString" time="0.001"/>
<testcase name="testUnwrappedText" time="0.002"/>
<testcase name="testGetDOMImplementation" time="0.004"/>
<testcase name="testEscape" time="0"/>
</testsuite>pomodoro:oodt mattmann$
Cheers,
Chris
From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk>
Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Date: Monday, September 30, 2019 at 6:57 AM
To: <dev@oodt.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] OODT 1.9 RC 4
Hi Folks,
I have posted a 4th release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.9 release.
The
source code is at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for
details on
release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT
release process, documented on the Wiki here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
The release was made from the OODT 1.9 tag (a825085) at:
https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.9
A staged Maven repository is available at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1023
Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.9. The vote is
open for at least the next 72 hours.
Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the
release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
passes
if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT <version>
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
Thanks!
Tom
P.S. Here is my +1.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
--
Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.
All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and
its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed
and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
