[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996612#comment-13996612 ]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1825: -------------------------------------- {quote}One thing to note is that after running with this patch cannot rollback to a older version. New workflows should be fine. But already running workflows will fail or cannot rerun a succeeded workflow.{quote} Do you mean that if you're using Oozie without OOZIE-1825, and you upgrade to an Oozie with OOZIE-1825, existing jobs will be okay; but if you then decide to downgrade to an Oozie without OOZIE-1825, existing jobs will fail? > Optimize wf_jobs protoconf storage > ---------------------------------- > > Key: OOZIE-1825 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1825 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Purshotam Shah > Assignee: Purshotam Shah > Attachments: OOZIE-1825-V3.patch > > > Currently protoconf stores all Hadoop configuration properties + libpath + ... > Hadoop configuration properties are lot and take huge space, I don't think we > need to store Hadoop configuration properties in protoconf. > We can load it every time wf action runs. > Some statistics on table storage. > || Table || Size(gb) || > |WFJOBS_PROTO_ACTION_CONF|55.54| > |WFJOBS_WF_INSTANCE|11.89| > |WFJOBS_CONF|2.43| > If we can remove Hadoop configuration form proto, size will be < 1gb. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)