[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14031701#comment-14031701
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1685:
----------------------------------

Testing JIRA OOZIE-1685

Cleaning local git workspace

----------------------------

{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than 
132
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 4 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT 
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc 
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac 
warnings
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA 
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.    Tests run: 1470
.    Tests failed: 3
.    Tests errors: 2

.    The patch failed the following testcases:

.      
testConcurrencyReachedAndChooseNextEligible(org.apache.oozie.service.TestCallableQueueService)
.      
testBundleEngineSuspend(org.apache.oozie.servlet.TestV1JobServletBundleEngine)
.      
testTimeOutWithUnresolvedMissingDependencies(org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordPushDependencyCheckXCommand)

{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch 

----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}


The full output of the test-patch run is available at

.   https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/1316/

> Oozie doesn’t process correctly workflows with a non-default name node
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1685
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Benjamin Zhitomirsky
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: Design of the fix OOZIE-1685-rev1.docx, 
> oozie-1685-trunk.patch, oozie-1685-trunk.patch, oozie-1685-trunk.patch, 
> oozie-1685.1.patch, oozie-1685.2.patch, oozie-1685.3.patch, 
> oozie-1685.4.patch, oozie-1685.5.patch, oozie-1685.6.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>  Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> When <name-node> element in Oozie workflow specifies a name node different 
> from the default one (specified in core-site.xml), the following 
> functionality doesn’t work properly:
> - Location of libraries specified via 
> oozie.service.WorkflowAppService.system.libpath. Oozie first (during launcher 
> configuration) tries to locate them using name node specified by the 
> <name-node> element, but later during job submission it expects this path to 
> be under the default Oozie name node 
> - Processing of the job-xml element if job xml is specified via absolute 
> path. Oozie tries locate it under the default Oozie name node instead of the 
> name-node specified in action.
> Specifying non-default name node makes a lot of sense in Azure environment, 
> because it allows to submit the same job to different Hadoop clusters.
> I will submit a fix for CR soon. Please refer attached short document for 
> more information.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to