[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Azrael updated OOZIE-1890:
--------------------------
Attachment: OOZIE-1890.1.patch
This is initial patch.
> Make oozie-site empty and reconcile defaults between oozie-default and the
> code
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-1890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1890
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Robert Kanter
> Attachments: OOZIE-1890.1.patch
>
>
> As shwetha and puru suggested in OOZIE-1888, oozie-site vs oozie-default is a
> point of confusion for users. We've also had issues in the past where
> they've had different values from each other and/or from the code's default
> (i.e. {{conf.get(PROP_NAME, DEFAULT_VALUE)}}).
> We should make oozie-default the only source of truth by:
> # Putting all configuration properties in oozie-default.
> # Making oozie-site empty; if the user wants to change a property, they can
> copy it out of the for-reference oozie-default.
> # Getting rid of the code defaults. It's easy for these to be out of sync
> with oozie-default, leading to confusion. They aren't used anyway because
> oozie-default should always be there (and will now have every property)
> This will require looking through all classes to make sure we're not missing
> anything from oozie-default and also checking that we put the proper default
> value (from all 3 sources) into oozie-default. It may be nice to also
> reorder the properties in oozie-default alphabetically (and also do this
> going forward with new properties).
> Also, {{oozie.service.WorkflowAppService.system.libpath}} should be set to
> "/user/$\{user.name\}/share/lib" (which is what OOZIE-1888 wanted to do).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
