> On July 3, 2014, 6:57 p.m., Robert Kanter wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/ZKLocksService.java, line 51
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/23245/diff/2/?file=622995#file622995line51>
> >
> >     nitpick: shouldn't this be LEADER_PATH?
> >     
> >     Can you also mention this path in the class javadoc comment?
> 
> Robert Kanter wrote:
>     Also, in the interest of keeping our ZooKeeper namespace clean and well 
> organized, perhaps we should place this under /services/ (i.e. 
> /services/locksChildReaperLeader)?  Alternatively, if we do OOZIE-1916 first, 
> then I don't think we need to use the ChildReaper's internal leader-latch.

Actually, I think not using the internal leader-latch may make this more 
complicated to implement, so let's not do that.  

But I think /services/locksChildReaperLeader is the right place to put this.  
Also be sure to update the javadoc in ZKUtils that talks about /services.


- Robert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23245/#review47308
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 2, 2014, 8:22 p.m., Purshotam Shah wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23245/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 2, 2014, 8:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Bugs: OOZIE-1906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1906
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> OOZIE-1906 Service to periodically remove ZK lock
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/ZKLocksService.java d03a899 
>   core/src/main/resources/oozie-default.xml 982c82f 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestZKLocksService.java a773469 
>   pom.xml bad1e0f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23245/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> UTC and manual testing.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Purshotam Shah
> 
>

Reply via email to