No problem. OOZIE-1811 did fix root cause of non-flaky tests failing randomly 
but there's one which is timing sensitive and needs to be fixed
org.apache.oozie.service.TestCallableQueueService.testConcurrencyReachedAndChooseNextEligible


and OOZIE-1952 will fix TestPurgeXCommand which uses old StoreService code.

And then we're done! :)

 
Mona Chitnis
Software Engineer, Hadoop Team
Yahoo!


On Friday, August 1, 2014 4:25 PM, Purshotam Shah 
<purus...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:
 


Thanks Mona for fixing testcases. It feel so good to see no UTC failure.


On 8/1/14, 4:13 PM, "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>    [ 
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1939?page=com.atlassian.jira.p
>lugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14083151#com
>ment-14083151 ] 
>
>Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1939:
>----------------------------------
>
>Testing JIRA OOZIE-1939
>
>Cleaning local git workspace
>
>----------------------------
>
>{color:green}+1
 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
>{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
>{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing
>spaces
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer
>than 132
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
>{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
>. 
   {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
>warnings
>{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new
>Javadoc warnings
>{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
>.    {color:green}+1{color} HEAD
 compiles
>.    {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new
>javac warnings
>{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
>Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
>.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
>{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
>.    Tests run: 1506
>{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
>.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with
 the patch
>
>----------------------------
>{color:green}*+1 Overall result, good!, no -1s*{color}
>
>
>The full output of the test-patch run is available at
>
>.  https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/1377/
>
>> Incorrect job information is set while logging
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: OOZIE-1939
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1939
>>             Project: Oozie
>>          Issue Type: Bug
>>            Reporter: Purshotam Shah
>>            Assignee: Azrael
>>         Attachments: OOZIE-1939.1.patch, OOZIE-1939.2.patch
>>
>>
>> {code}
>> 2014-07-16 17:28:06,422 DEBUG
 CoordChangeXCommand:545
>>[http-0.0.0.0-4443-5] - USER[hadoopqa] GROUP[users] TOKEN[]
>>APP[coordB236] JOB[0011514-140716042555-oozie-oozi-C] ACTION[-] Acquired
>>lock for [0011385-140716042555-oozie-oozi-C] in [coord_change]
>> 2014-07-16 17:28:06,422 TRACE CoordChangeXCommand:548
>>[http-0.0.0.0-4443-5] - USER[hadoopqa] GROUP[users] TOKEN[]
>>APP[coordB236] JOB[0011514-140716042555-oozie-oozi-C] ACTION[-] Load
>>state for [0011385-140716042555-oozie-oozi-C]
>> {code}
>> {code}
>>     protected void loadState() throws CommandException {
>>         jpaService = Services.get().get(JPAService.class);
>>         if (jpaService == null) {
>>             LOG.error(ErrorCode.E0610);
>>         }
>>        
 try {
>>             coordJob =
>>CoordJobQueryExecutor.getInstance().get(CoordJobQuery.GET_COORD_JOB_MATER
>>IALIZE, jobId);
>>             prevStatus = coordJob.getStatus();
>>         }
>>         catch (JPAExecutorException jex) {
>>             throw new CommandException(jex);
>>         }
>>         // calculate start materialize and end materialize time
>>        
 calcMatdTime();
>>         LogUtils.setLogInfo(coordJob, logInfo);
>>     }
>> {code}
>> Most of the commands set jobinfo after loadstate, because of that few
>>log statements ( like acquiring lock, load state) logs with
 previous
>>jobinfo. 
>
>
>
>--
>This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to