[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14198860#comment-14198860
 ] 

Rohini Palaniswamy commented on OOZIE-2043:
-------------------------------------------

 I am surprised that we did not seem them fail before. Most of the tests which 
depended on HashMap order failed between jdk6 and jdk7 itself. Change is ok for 
TestLiteWorkflowAppParser. But for TestHCatELFunctions.java, I think we should 
fix it to always return in same order as it is a user facing EL function.

> Misc test failures against JDK8
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-2043
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2043
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tests
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: OOZIE-2043.patch
>
>
> Using the below procedure, I built Oozie with Java 7 and then built and ran 
> the tests with Java 8:
> - set java 7
> - {{mvn clean test -DskipTests}}
> - {{find . -name test-classes | grep target/test-classes | xargs rm -rf}}     
>   // Delete test classes
> - set java 8
> - {{mvn test -DtargetJavaVersion=1.8}}
> There were 3 test failures:
> - org.apache.oozie.coord.TestHCatELFunctions.testDataOutPartitions
> -- it was expecting {{'region=euro,datastamp=20130230'}} but now got 
> {{'datastamp=20130230,region=euro'}}
> - org.apache.oozie.util.TestELConstantsFunctions.testAppendAll
> -- Java 8 changes the behavior of the String.split method to not include a 
> leading empty String if the pattern matches the front of the String.  To 
> remain backwards compatible, the solution here was to emulate this behavior 
> so the appendAll method behaves the same as it did with Java 6 and 7.
> - 
> org.apache.oozie.workflow.lite.TestLiteWorkflowAppParser.testForkJoinMismatch
> -- it was checking a parameterized error message where the order of the 
> parameters switched



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to