[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512035#comment-14512035
 ] 

Rohini Palaniswamy commented on OOZIE-1899:
-------------------------------------------

Also to note that even for a 300K files listing, it only takes 50MB according 
to HDFS-985 and I doubt it will cause much memory issues with Oozie server 
unless there are extreme cases of ~million listings with very long path names. 
And in those cases as I mentioned before, you will hit OOM in Oozie before you 
get to throw an error that the limit is exceeded which does not solve the 
problem. Even in HDFS-985, they do not worry about the issue of memory pressure 
on NN, but holding locks and RPC payload sizes.  


> Improve the documentation for the FS action's glob feature
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1899
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: docs
>    Affects Versions: trunk, 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>
> We should add some more detail to the documentation on the FS action's glob 
> feature.  It currently just says this:
> {quote}
> In case of move , delete , chmod and chgrp commands, a glob pattern can also 
> be specified instead of an absolute path. For move , glob pattern can only be 
> specified for source path and not the target.
> {quote}
> The user has no idea how to specify a glob pattern after reading this.  An 
> example would be nice too.
> Also, {{oozie.action.fs.glob.max}} in oozie-site/default is supposed to let 
> you specify how many files can be matched against the glob pattern.  This 
> isn't mentioned anywhere in the documentation and isn't even in oozie-site or 
> oozie-default.  It should be added to oozie-default.xml and mentioned in the 
> docs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to