[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644442#comment-14644442
 ] 

Jaydeep Vishwakarma commented on OOZIE-2024:
--------------------------------------------

Can you check few things:
Is the history server running?
Jobs logs are copying to history directory?
Check if jobs are running and moving to history directory when you are running 
them without oozie?
What is the permission do you have in history directory.

> Confusing message when a job can't be looked up by JavaActionExecutor
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-2024
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2024
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: action
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Harsh J
>            Assignee: Harsh J
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: OOZIE-2024.patch, OOZIE-2024.patch, OOZIE-2024.patch
>
>
> When you have issues where JT is missing job history or JHS is lacking it, 
> causing JavaActionExecutor to fail when its RunningJob is returned back as 
> null, it prints a very confusing message such as below, that can read instead 
> as "This is not the Job ID I was supposed to find" instead of what is meant 
> to be "I could not find this Job ID on the server":
> {code}
> "JA017: Unknown hadoop job [job_12048563533402_20232] associated with action 
> [1129661-1909061866638236-oozie-oozi-W@java-action]. Failing this action!”
> {code}
> What would instead be clearer is this:
> {code}
> "JA017: Could not lookup launched hadoop job ID [job_12048563533402_20232] 
> which was associated with action 
> [1129661-1909061866638236-oozie-oozi-W@java-action]. Failing this action!”
> {code}
> Patch attached, feel free to refine further during commit if the text is 
> unsatisfactory in parts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to