[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15280892#comment-15280892
 ] 

Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1805:
--------------------------------------

[~ergin.demirel], it's supposed to :)  I recently discovered that it does not, 
which is a bug.  We're tracking that in OOZIE-2494.

> Oozie Cron diverges from standard timezone and day behaviours
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1805
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1805
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>         Environment: CDH5
>            Reporter: Hari Sekhon
>
> The addition of cron syntax in Oozie (OOZIE-1306) is a good idea but the 
> implementation of the fields diverges from standard cron which seems counter 
> intuitive for unix veterans.
> Taken from Cloudera's blog:
> http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2014/04/how-to-use-cron-like-scheduling-in-apache-oozie
> 1. Executing in UTC seems like a bad idea when cron uses local timeā€¦ if you 
> wanted to use UTC you would do it for everything and set your servers to UTC 
> timezone.
> Having to translate timezones to figure out what to enter requires more 
> effort on the part of the user.
> 2. The day field offsets are wrong/needlessly different compared to ISC cron 
> which is zero indexed and uses 0 or 7 for Sunday instead of starting from 1.
> These points will cause a less intuitive experience and surely some 
> misconfigurations... could we realign this or would it require an upstream 
> fix to the Quartz Scheduler? If the latter would it be easier to just reindex 
> the days and calculate the timezone in Oozie before feeding to Quartz?
> Thanks
> Hari Sekhon
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/harisekhon



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to