[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15396964#comment-15396964 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1676: ---------------------------------- Testing JIRA OOZIE-1676 Cleaning local git workspace ---------------------------- {color:red}-1{color} Patch failed to apply to head of branch ---------------------------- > Instrumentation and Configuration over the REST API and Web UI should include > all Oozie servers > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OOZIE-1676 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1676 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: HA > Affects Versions: trunk > Reporter: Robert Kanter > Assignee: Robert Kanter > Priority: Minor > Fix For: trunk > > Attachments: OOZIE-1676.patch, OOZIE-1676.patch, OOZIE-1676.patch, > OOZIE-1676.patch, screenshot.jpg, screenshot2.jpg > > > This isn't that important, but it would be good if we updated the REST API > and Web UI to return the instrumentation and configuration for each Oozie > server when HA is being used. As it stands, each time you refresh the page > (and are going through the load balancer), you'll get the > instrumentation/configuration for a different server, which are not identical > and there isn't really a way to tell which server they came from. This > should be a new version of the REST API (v3) because it would change the > return format to be an array of servers with their > instrumentation/configuration info. > The backend of this would have the contacted Oozie server simply ask each of > the other Oozie servers for their instrumentation or configuration and > combine them all (with the name of each server) into the response. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)