[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15662949#comment-15662949
]
Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2723:
---------------------------------------
All the recent browsers supports {{JSON.stringify}} and {{JSON.parse}}
natively. So we can remove the {{json2.js}} and from {{index.jsp}}.
Is this approach correct? I working on to test it. Thanks.
CC: [~rohini], [~jaydeepvishwakarma], [~asasvari], [~gezapeti], [~pbacsko],
[~satishsaley]
> JSON.org license is now CatX
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2723
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2723
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.3.0
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Robert Kanter
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.3.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2723.001.patch, OOZIE-2723.002.patch,
> OOZIE-2723.003.patch
>
>
> per [update resolved legal|http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#json]:
> {quote}
> CAN APACHE PRODUCTS INCLUDE WORKS LICENSED UNDER THE JSON LICENSE?
> No. As of 2016-11-03 this has been moved to the 'Category X' license list.
> Prior to this, use of the JSON Java library was allowed. See Debian's page
> for a list of alternatives.
> {quote}
> Looks like this is on branch-4.3 and later. (maybe earlier if it was brought
> in transitively.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
