[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068766#comment-16068766
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2854:
----------------------------------
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2854
Cleaning local git workspace
----------------------------
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
. {color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) with trailing spaces
. {color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 5 line(s) longer than 132
characters
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 10 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
. {color:red}WARNING{color}: the current HEAD has 1 Javadoc warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
. {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
{color:red}-1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
. {color:red}-1{color} the patch modifies 1 JPA file(s), persistence.xml or
*-orm.xml
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
. Tests run: 1022
. Tests rerun: 22
. Tests failed at first run: org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestLauncherAM,
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
{color:red}. There is at least one warning, please check{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/3933/
> Oozie should handle transient database problems
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2854
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2854
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Peter Bacsko
> Assignee: Andras Piros
> Attachments: OOZIE-2854-001.patch, OOZIE-2854-002.patch,
> OOZIE-2854-003.patch, OOZIE-2854-004.patch, OOZIE-2854-005.patch,
> OOZIE-2854.006.patch, OOZIE-2854-POC-001.patch
>
>
> There can be problems when Oozie cannot update the database properly.
> Recently, we have experienced erratic behavior with two setups:
> * MySQL with the Galera cluster manager. Galera uses cluster-wide optimistic
> locking which might cause a transaction to rollback if there are two or more
> parallel transaction running and one of them cannot complete because of a
> conflict.
> * MySQL with Percona XtraDB Cluster. If one of the MySQL instances is killed,
> Oozie might get "Communications link failure" exception during the failover.
> The problem is that failed DB transactions later might cause a workflow
> (which are started/re-started by RecoveryService) to get stuck. It's not
> clear to us how this happens but it has to do with the fact that certain DB
> updates are not executed.
> The solution is to use some sort of retry logic with exponential backoff if
> the DB update fails. We could start with a 100ms wait time which is doubled
> at every retry. The operation can be considered a failure if it still fails
> after 10 attempts. These values could be configurable. We should discuss
> initial values in the scope of this JIRA.
> Note that this solution is to handle *transient* failures. If the DB is down
> for a longer period of time, we have to accept that the internal state of
> Oozie is corrupted.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
