-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69469/#review210927
-----------------------------------------------------------



Overall direction is OK. Please add some unit tests, and sample 
`oozie-instrumentation.log` snippets.


core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/CoordMaterializeTriggerService.java
Lines 71 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69469/#comment295765>

    `currentMaterializedJobsCount` would be a better name.



core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/CoordMaterializeTriggerService.java
Lines 72 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69469/#comment295766>

    `currentMaterializedDelayedJobsCount` would be a better name.



core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/CoordMaterializeTriggerService.java
Lines 174 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69469/#comment295763>

    Typo in variable name. What about instead: `final long now = ...`


- András Piros


On Nov. 28, 2018, 11:56 a.m., zhang junfan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69469/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 28, 2018, 11:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie and András Piros.
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We have multiple Oozie scheduled clusters. The problem that is currently 
> encountered is that some materialize queues are too late to process during 
> the peak hours of the scheduled tasks. We need to get the metrics of the 
> delay queue for alarm monitoring and adjust the configuration to optimize.
> Currently we have added metrics for queue size and latency in Oozie 
> CoordMaterializeTriggerService class, in order to reflect the general trend 
> of current scheduling.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/CoordMaterializeTriggerService.java
>  1cbd4749 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69469/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> zhang junfan
> 
>

Reply via email to